Partial Realization in Dynamic Justification Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
Justification logic is an epistemic framework that provides a way to express explicit justifications for the agent’s belief. In this paper, we present OPAL, a dynamic justification logic that includes term operators to reflect public announcements on the level of justifications. We create dynamic epistemic semantics for OPAL. We also elaborate on the relationship of dynamic justification logics to Gerbrandy–Groeneveld’s PAL by providing a partial realization theorem.
منابع مشابه
Realization for justification logics via nested sequents: Modularity through embedding
Justification logics are refinements of modal logics, where justification terms replace modalities. Modal and justification logics are connected via the so-called realization theorems. We develop a general constructive method of proving the realization of a modal logic in an appropriate justification logic by means of cut-free modal nested sequent systems. We prove a constructive realization th...
متن کاملRealization Theorems for Justification Logics: Full Modularity
Justification logics were introduced by Artemov in 1995 to provide intuitionistic logic with a classical provability semantics, a problem originally posed by Gödel. Justification logics are refinements of modal logics and formally connected to them by so-called realization theorems. A constructive proof of a realization theorem typically relies on a cut-free sequent-style proof system for the c...
متن کاملRealization using the model existence theorem
Justification logics refine modal logics by replacing the usual necessity operator with a family of justification terms that embody reasons for the necessity of a formula, rather than simply recording the fact of necessity. Many common modal logics have justification counterparts. The connection between a modal logic and its justification counterpart is through a Realization Theorem, which says...
متن کاملThe Realization Theorem for S5 A Simple, Constructive Proof
Justification logics are logics of knowledge in which explicit reasons are formally represented. Standard logics of knowledge have justification logic analogs. Connecting justification logics and logics of knowledge are Realization Theorems. In this paper we give a new, constructive proof of the Realization Theorem connecting S5 and its justification analog, JS5. This proof is, I believe, the s...
متن کاملA Syntactic Realization Theorem for Justification Logics
Justification logics are refinements of modal logics where modalities are replaced by justification terms. They are connected to modal logics via so-called realization theorems. We present a syntactic proof of a single realization theorem that uniformly connects all the normal modal logics formed from the axioms d, t, b, 4, and 5 with their justification counterparts. The proof employs cut-free...
متن کامل